What is best to run on: concrete or asphalt?

The article aims to answer the question What is best to run on: concrete or asphalt?”. It will also explain why asphalt is considered a better running option than concrete. 

What is best to run on: concrete or asphalt?

Which surface is optimal for running depends on the runner’s preferences, objectives, and availability to diverse locations.

Sidewalks provide a safer option for runners (since they allow them to stay out of the way of moving traffic), but asphalt is more forgiving because of its softer surface. If you must run on a hard surface, it is best to do it on asphalt roads whenever possible.

Asphalt is beneficial for speed training because of its homogeneity and predictability. You can run faster if you don’t have to focus on where your feet are going. The Achilles tendon receives less pressure from this flat, solid surface. 

In addition, most roadways are printed on asphalt, so you can easily keep track of your distance using a smartphone app, an internet map, or even just your car’s odometer. The harshness of asphalt may be rough on the body, especially the joints. 

Careful navigation of traffic, potholes, and chambers are also required (the slight downward incline at the very edge of the road). Despite being more durable than asphalt, many individuals choose to run on concrete because of its accessibility and convenience.

The level, smooth surface and lack of potential hazards make concrete sidewalks a popular choice. According to studies, the impact of the terrain on the muscles and joints is minimal if the runner is not traveling too quickly.

In any case, you should think about the potential drawbacks. It has a significant influence, particularly when running quickly. When navigating city streets, you must also avoid curbs, other pedestrians, and moving vehicles.

Is running on concrete bad for your hips?

Continue reading the article to know if running on concrete is bad for your hips:

There is a wide variety of surfaces available for running. However, many of us are confined to metropolitan areas where we have few choices. Therefore, we spend the vast majority of our time jogging on asphalt and concrete.

Given this, it’s natural that many people wonder about it. When jogging, does it hurt the knees to be on concrete? Is it harmful to the joints, too? The quick response is “yes.” It’s arguable, however. Your legs, knees, and hips take more impact from landing each step on a hard surface.

Over the last decade or two, however, advancements in running shoe technology have allowed designers to lessen the impact of impact shock. However, this does not imply that jogging on concrete is preferable to other surfaces for the health of your knees. 

Even with modern running shoe cushioning, the impact of running on concrete is around 20% more on the lower extremities and hips than jogging on grass or dirt (Here is a study measuring the impact of different running surfaces).

That’s why it’s recommended to limit your time spent pounding the pavement if you want to avoid knee discomfort. Fortunately, there are benefits to jogging on the pavement. Running on a smooth surface has been shown to be beneficial for runners’ knees since they are more likely to remain stable during the gait cycle. 

Therefore, running on the road lessens the effects of pronation, knee rotation, and jerky motions. When jogging off-road, less power is sent back up the body, but you increase your risk of injury from things like tripping, rolling your ankle, or pulling a muscle.

While running on the pavement has its benefits, runners will reap the most rewards by mixing pavement runs with terrain runs. By doing so, you may improve the health of your lower extremities and your hips and knees. To recuperate, you should run on concrete.

What is running on asphalt vs concrete myth?

Since we’re already talking about running surfaces, let’s debunk a myth that’s been doing the rounds on the internet for a long time. So much for the argument that it’s better to run on concrete than asphalt.

Compared to concrete, asphalt is often thought to be easier on the body and knees. Although it is a softer composite than concrete or asphalt, you won’t notice much of a difference when you’re jogging on it.

There may be a little advantage to running on asphalt as opposed to concrete for the top runner who logs more than 100 kilometres per week. However, jogging on the asphalt just a few times a week won’t help the normal person in the long term.

Since pavement and dirt roads are far more demanding than softer surfaces like grass or dirt trails, runners who place a premium on their feet’ comfort should adhere to a regimen that includes a healthy dose of each.

Why asphalt is a better running option than concrete?

When compared to concrete, asphalt is the superior running and jogging surface for a number of reasons (and biking, skating, and driving for that matter). Because of its design, asphalt pavements provide a flat, even surface free of trip hazards like expansion joints and fissures.

Anecdotal evidence and some medical research suggest that asphalt is gentler on joints than concrete, albeit appropriate form and footwear have the most influence. Because of its greater flexibility compared to concrete, asphalt often experiences less wear and tear on its joints than the latter material over time. 

For instance, asphalt running surfaces lowered the likelihood of Achilles tendinopathy in top runners, according to research published by Foot & Ankle International in 2008 (Acute and overuse injuries connected to an hour.

If there are no off-road jogging trails nearby, a runner may choose for the added safety of a concrete sidewalk instead of a paved road. Joint pain from standing on concrete may increase with time, but it beats being run over any day. 

A concrete surface is called stiff pavement. The system is not adaptable in any way. For this reason, asphalt is often referred to as “flexible pavement.” The choice of jogging surface is important, and although asphalt is preferable to concrete, it may not be the greatest option. 

You’ll understand what I’m talking about if you’ve ever run on a track with a rubberized surface. The track itself serves as a shock absorber while you’re running on it. The track’s surface is much different in quality from standard asphalt. 

Although asphalt or concrete may have served as the initial foundation for a track, a layer of tiny rubber granules is often added to give the surface a more forgiving and springy texture. Although asphalt concrete pavement is not as pliable as rubber, it does have some give. 

There are asphalts that are better at dampening the effects of running than others. Both asphalt and concrete have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of riding quality. Although the Contractor has a significant role, there are certain differences between the two that cannot be changed.

A sidewalk serves as an illustration. Several trees near to the path have sent out new roots under the asphalt. If the road were asphalt, the roots may push up through the surface and form a raised area. 

Additionally, concrete has a propensity to fracture, lift, or settle, resulting in hazardous tripping surfaces. Before I had knee replacement surgery, I liked to run on dirt or grass. There may still be some trip dangers, but the overall experience is considerably more positive.

Conclusion

Injuries including Achilles tendonitis, shin splints, and stress fractures of the tiny bones in the foot and ankle are all possible outcomes of running on hard surfaces. Ankle and knee twists are common among runners who train on soft surfaces because of the uneven terrain and the runner’s efforts to adapt to it.

Frequently asked questions (FAQS): What is best to run on: concrete or asphalt?

What is best to run on: concrete or asphalt?

Which surface is optimal for running depends on the runner’s preferences, objectives, and availability to diverse locations.

Sidewalks provide a safer option for runners (since they allow them to stay out of the way of moving traffic), but asphalt is more forgiving because of its softer surface. If you must run on a hard surface, it is best to do it on asphalt roads whenever possible.

Asphalt is beneficial for speed training because of its homogeneity and predictability. You can run faster if you don’t have to focus on where your feet are going. The Achilles tendon receives less pressure from this flat, solid surface. 

Why asphalt is a better running option than concrete?

When compared to concrete, asphalt is the superior running and jogging surface for a number of reasons (and biking, skating, and driving for that matter). Because of its design, asphalt pavements provide a flat, even surface free of trip hazards like expansion joints and fissures.

Anecdotal evidence and some medical research suggest that asphalt is gentler on joints than concrete, albeit appropriate form and footwear have the most influence. Because of its greater flexibility compared to concrete, asphalt often experiences less wear and tear on its joints than the latter material over time.

Bibliography

Concrete Vs Asphalt. Runners connect. Retrieved from: https://runnersconnect.net/running-questions/concrete-vs-asphalt/

What was missing from this post which could have made it better?

Leave a Comment